• English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
  • New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
    Communities & Collections
    Self Submission
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
  • New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
MUST Repository
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Mwidege,Asheri .M."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Does Tanzania Social Action Fund intervention a panacea to food insecure vulnerable rural poor people?
    (International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 2014-08) Mwidege,Asheri .M.; Mlambiti,M.E.; Damas, P.
    Development intervention is increasingly reported as a means of improving the livelihoods of the vulnerable poor people. However, little information on what could have been happened if there could be no intervention is available. This study was conducted to assess the livelihood impact of Tanzania Social Action Fund intervention in Agriculture for vulnerable communities in Makete and Rungwe Districts. This research examined whether intervention in food security is a panacea for the vulnerable communities. A quasi-experimental design was used to collect a sample of 239 and 115 recipient and non-recipient households and triangulation approaches were employed, respectively. Paired t-test, chi-square test and phi-coefficient were used to ascertain the significance of the means of differences, comparing sample variance and strength of relationship between qualitative variables, respectively. Results showed that recipients were food insecure than non recipients. Based on these findings, it is concluded that intervention on food security through participation is not a panacea to vulnerable communities. Therefore, it is recommended that intervention should be on prevention basis rather than coping strategies.
Other Links
  • Government portal
  • Ministry of Education
  • TCU
  • Free E-Journals
  • Tz Newspapers Online
  • Open Access Resources – INASP
useful resources
  • Emerald Database
  • Taylor & Francis
  • EBSCO Host
  • Research4Life
  • Elsevier Journal
Contact us
  • Mbeya University of Science and Technology.
    P.O. Box 131,
    Mbeya,
    Tanzania.
    Phone: +255 25 295 7544
    must@must.ac.tz

MUST copyright © 2002-2026

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback